Chemical Fluorescence over Brighton, UK – Geoengineering
All Chemtrail Videos, Chemtrail Evidence, Featured Tuesday, August 30th, 2011
Print 
PDF
Video of fluorescent, chemical clouds over Brighton, UK filmed on August 7, 2011 provides evidence of a worldwide geoengineering effort.
Just disgusting geoengineered air pollution on day two of the London now UK Riots, make no mistake, these chemicals we and our children have to breath is lowering immune system, causing ADHD ADD FMS CFS ALZHEIMERS coupled with the low grade hydroponic vegetables we get in UK supermarkets and then add very low air quality with traffic smog and the chemical particulates from the Geoengineering all adds up to making us more likely to get ill a lot more often, leading to chronic illnesses, like Chronic Fatigue, MS, FMS, etc and making already existing chronic illnesses much worse like ADHD and Alzheimers due to the impact on the immune system of the body. This includes coughs, colds, skin rashes, hives, sore dry back of throat when walking into town.
Chemical Fluorescence over Brighton, UK - Geoengineering,
Posted by Community
on Aug 30 2011. Filed under All Chemtrail Videos, Chemtrail Evidence, Featured.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.
You can leave a response or trackback to this entry
..ummm…no.
Only water and ice refract light into rainbows, sundogs, iridescence and halos…
You see the ice crystals falling…”virga” its called…creating a classic sundog…parahelia
try science- its fun-damental.
http://www.atoptics.co.uk/halo/parhelia.htm
Yes, people getting scared of sundogs, yet again. Some people are determined to see a boogeyman anywhere.
Thor, actually ice crystals falling is not virga, virga is rain falling into dry air that evaporates on the way down.
With no disrespect Pilot- according to various definitions- Virga can include falling ice crystals…it is typically defined as falling precipitation that evaporates- which at high altitudes is usually ice… so, fall streaks from persistent contrails can be considered virga…unless I am mistaken…which did happen once several years ago
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virga
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/virga
http://weather.about.com/od/v/g/virga.htm
You can try to debunk this, but you can also pay attention and recognize that this phenomenon is visible only when chemtrails are being sprayed.
I look at the sky a lot, so I noticed the chemtrails and the link with the parhelium some years ago.
On chemtrail free days, the parhelium (and thus the sundogs) will only show up under the original conditions when there are ice particles in clouds within the higher atmospheric layers.
When you look something up in the wikipedia (like a parhelium), always check out the history of the story. Here in the Netherlands, the parhelium is pretty common now since they spray almost daily. A couple of years ago I saw the sundogs for the first time and was stunned by it. I looked it up in the wiki and found that the fact of it being pretty uncommonl and only visible at the north- and south poles or in extreme winter conditions had been redacted out.
Just open your eyes and use your brain, it is there for a reason and so is the parhelium. To aircrap.org, if you need more pictures of the chemtrail induced parhelium, let me know.
“this phenomenon is visible only when chemtrails are being sprayed.”
That is simply false. Sundogs have been observed since ancient times.
Sundogs are caused by light being refracted through ice. How can “chemicals” refract light?
Please explain how “chemicals” have crystalline plate structures that refract light- such as described here:
http://www.atoptics.co.uk/halo/dogfm.htm
fascinating- not a “chemtrail” to be seen in this photo of spectacular sundogs:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Fargo_Sundogs_2_18_09.jpg
I stand corrected..i had typically only seen virga used in reference to rainfall.
Amazing how little meteorlogical knowledge some chemtrailers have. If you have the right conditions for sundogs, ice crystals are present, probably as cirrus. When its favorable for cirrus, you will likely have prominent contrails.
Correlation is not Causation.
Apparently there must have been spraying going on throughout recorded history.
Thor’s picture makes perfect sense, northern US in February.
Ice particles will be all over the place.
What is shown in the video is quite different.
“What is shown in the video is quite different.”
Not really…the video shows clear evidence of ice in the atmosphere…even at midsummer is still well below zero at high altitudes- conditions conducive to ice…notice the lower cumulus clouds drifting beneath the higher cirrus….cirrus clouds are made of ice…sundogs occur from light refracting through ice…this is simple fact.
You haven’t explained how “chemicals” refract light.
Notice this description of sundogs:
“They are visible all over the world and at any time of year regardless of the ground level temperature. In Europe and North America one will be seen on average twice a week if searched for.”
http://www.atoptics.co.uk/halo/parhelia.htm
You often see sundogs in correlation with persistent contrails because persistent contrails are ice…
And this is just an example of an expensive way to water your crops?
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3107/2408511204_3f4eabc08d.jpg
Gonna tell me that this is just 100% harmless water vapor? You dorks (Thor and Pilot) should go stand out in the middle of one of these fields when they are dusting, and then tell me how you feel about your refractive theory.
Ummm, water vapor, is water in gas form. You do not see it.
And what they are spraying, is mostly liquid water, with whatever herbicide/insectide added.
What on earth do Cropdusters , and standing out in a field have to do with sundogs?
Your missing the point here. We’ll just pretend that you aren’t playing dumb — You and your cohort Thor are trying to come off that a chemical spray or solution would never have and can never have refractive properties.
This picture was provided to debunk you and prove that troglodite theory of yours to be incorrect. Ad homin Eminem m m m m intended.
The picture provided clearly shows a crop duster demonstrating a known method of chemical dispersion can produce refraction – see obvious prismatic colors left in the sprayer wake.
So if you cannot relate to the fact that there is even a smidgeon of a possibility that abnormal and excessive amounts of cloud condensation nuclei released into jet plumes are the cause of ever increasing frequency in the appearance of refraction in these artificial cirrus clouds. What these CCN are composed of, well it seems most people on here already have a pretty good idea (except for the ones who continue to play dumb.)
So – In that case maybe you and Thor should just head out to that field when they are crop dusting, having complete faith in your beliefs that there are absolutely no chemicals present when you see that little rainbow trailing behind – because chemicals cannot exist as CCN according to your church. Breath deep!
Such deflection and slight of hand – when are you guys ever gonna clue in? That game is getting old.
The real point that to consider is that there are other things than pure ice than can cause the light to reflect or be broken up as by a prism.
I know a bit about clouds, the ones in the movie and the ones I see in real life are surely no normal “cirrus clouds”. The parhelium we are talking about here looks quite different from the nice ice Halo: http://www.atoptics.co.uk/halosim.htm
That parhelium is basically an ice halo but distorted by -for example- polymers, metallic nano particles and who knows what else.
Since there is a lot of evidence that spraying/geo-engineering is actually happening but denied around the planet, there is something that needs to be investigated.
The evidence shows that levels of aluminum are rising seriously and are a danger to humans and other species, it would be insane to dismiss and not investigate this.
Oh, I noticed a nice chemtrail in Thor’s (Les Cowley’s?) link, see the main picture from topleft to the sun:
http://www.atoptics.co.uk/halo/parhelia.htm
http://www.atoptics.co.uk/halo/images1/mtru4_r1_c1.jpg
Illuminaughty-
How do you know that trail in the picture is a “chemtrail” and not simply a persistent contrail?
Are you under the mistaken belief that contrails cannot persist?
Geo-engineering can mean many different things- carbon sinks, tree planting, panels in space, iron fertilization and yes, even the use of aerosols.
There is absolutely NO evidence that ANY of this has been implemented…much less been taking place for the last 15 years.
The only “evidence” Believers point to are persistent trails in the sky…which happen to be known to be something else. They are not new or different than before and are thoroughly explained by basic physics. Other optical phenomenon such as halos and sundogs are also put forth as supposed “evidence” despite those being well known, long observed events.
“That parhelium is basically an ice halo but distorted by -for example- polymers, metallic nano particles”
Really? and what do you base that claim on? Your memory? You knowledge of atmospheric optics and cloud physics? What? Just saying it doesn’t make it so…
Perhaps you can explain why cloud scientists around the world are not equally alarmed by the trails in the sky as you? are they all member of the Illuminaughty?
look at these pics of halos…lots which one is a “chem” halo?
http://www.atoptics.co.uk/halo/dogim0.htm
Not normal clouds?- they look very similar to these clouds from 1905:
http://contrailscience.com/clouds-before-planes-cloud-studies-1905/
“The evidence shows that levels of aluminum are rising seriously ”
This is simply NOT the case. The “evidence” of aluminum put forth by Believers is incredibly suspect…and thatseven before the idea that any aluminum out of the ordinary actually found came from a persistent trail in the sky.
By all means investigate! but do it rationally with valid scientific methods. See here for some perspective on the so called “evidence” of aluminum:
http://metabunk.org/threads/137-Shasta-Snow-and-Water-Aluminum-Tests.
As for Cy- thats a neat picture you found…interesting to note that what you see there is iridescence- involving the Diffraction and Interference of light through water droplets….which is obviously different than refracting of light through a crystalline structure of an ice crystal.
So…we are back at square one…You see something that is well known, understood and expected and claim it is something else…based on your memory and a herd on the internet crying in shrill tones thats its true.
You see a persistent contrail and claim its a sprayed “chemtrail” cuz you do not remember them before….all the while neglecting any evidence that suggest your memory may not be accurate or complete.
You see a sundog- something that has been recorded for 1000s of years and say it only exists because they “sprayed” something in the sky and you never used to see them before…
Keep on investigating- prove me wrong! its fun to watch…
There’s evidence …such as endless amounts of aircraft turning it on and off whilst leaving airports . too low to be condensation (doesn’t turn on and off) and in ALL conditions … Your science is mistaken , if u believe for a second that there are no geoengineering aircraft spraying around the world …your either a hypnotised fool or just an idiot !
here is a neat picture- how many will claim its a “chem” cloud??
http://www.atoptics.co.uk/halo/dogim6.htm
@Thor: First of all, who do you think you are? Try to have some respect, you have mo clue who I am, my knowledge nore my experience. So let me keep this short.
You stated “what do you base that claim on? Your memory? You knowledge of atmospheric optics and cloud physics?”
Well yes, first of all my memory, I am old enough to remember the changes. I noticed some contrails that caught my eye in the mid nineties. They were different from the ones I used to see and I noticed something actually changed back then.
Then, being an amateur astronomer with a bunch of scopes, sky- and stargazing experience I actually do know about the atmosohere and its optical effects. I need to, so I also knew what a halo and sundog looked like back then and thus was able to notice changes.
The clouds in the book you posted a link to (http://contrailscience.com/clouds-before-planes-cloud-studies-1905/) look perfectly fine to me. And no I do not believe that cloud scientists are part of whatever creepy club.
You appear to be pretty convinced of your view of this story but maybe you too should keep an open mind, it’s a healthy thing you know.
So stop being so full of yourself, I actually have done my research including patents of means to induce certain materials into the atmosphere, have you?
Anyway, a discussion like this one is leading nowhere. So you can keep trying to debunk anything with all possible force but this behaviour really does not make you more credible.
So long and try to look at this from another angle, whatever they are spraying with the available technology, you and your loved ones are breathing, eating and drinking it too.
Really?
By presenting a different opinion I am not showing respect.
Try and have an open mind and understand that other people may have looked at the same body of data and come to different conclusions…
“I am old enough to remember the changes”
…and memory is infallible?
Please explain why I remember skies back in the 70s IDENTICAL to what are claimed to be “chem” skies today?
Please explain why there is overwhelming evidence in pictures, eyewitness accounts, scientific research etc dating back 60yrs that show irrefutably that skies could and did look like skies of today….?
I am do not care about my credibility. I just put forth facts and people will let their biases decide whether to accept them or not.
Try and look at from another angle…given the fact that seeing a sundog, or a persistent contrail is not evidence of anything more than simple, known atmospheric physics…its is quite possible and even likely that they are not “spraying” anything at all…and you and your family are breathing a myth…
During the 60′s there were both weather experiments and ‘chemical warfare experiments off the east coast of the UK. MEMORY …I remember sitting on beaches on Greek islands staring up into PRISTINE blue skies and watching aircraft fly over at cruise altitude . AND NO TRAILS … Your attempt at disinfo is pathetic and NOT GOOD ENOUGH .
@ Thor.
Yes really, and as indicated I am not wasting any more time on Trolls and senseless debunkers like yourself. Good luck with your ice particles
of course not…why bother discussing facts that challenge your beliefs?
better in live in the comfort of your own fear bubble than challenge yourself to learn and grow…
Good luck with that.
You provide no facts …just distraction . GEOENGINEERING isn’t a subject to be BELIEVED in . That would be god or angels your talking about . geoengineering is a subject quite easily observed and one which can be studied in university’s around the UK .
Chemtrails KC-135 Seperate Fuel Tanks
Thread: Chmetrails KC-135 Seperate Fuel Tanks
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1628676/pg1
climate.envsci.rutgers.edu/pdf/GRLreview2.pdf
Options for dispersing gases from planes include the addition of sulfur to the fuel, which would release the aerosol through the exhaust system of the plane, or the attachment of a nozzle to release the sulfur from its own tank within the plane, which would be the better option.
Hello my friend! I want to say that this article is amazing, nice written and include approximately all important infos. I’d like to see more posts like this.
Nice Post of the crimes taking place, keep up the good work. And as all of you can see the trolls on here are going crazy…..Using their Pseudo-Logic BS….
Does anyone else find it strange that people who don’t believe in chemtrails despite the the overwhelming evidence would spend time going through a chemtrail dedicated website? And as for quoting comtrailscience.com – really?
I went to Brighton around the period this video was shot because I had had enough for the day of being sprayed in Croydon – what did I find when I got to Brighton…? You’ve got it – more trails!
I’ve amassed over 4000 photos in the last month including ones in Brighton and Coventry – since the Croydon riots which are to be displayed on my blog chemtrailuk.com once I’ve finished the content.
It still amazes me how people refuse to wake up!
Bob,
These guys aren’t here to ‘wake up’, they’re here to try to keep people dumbed down. Strawman conversation if anyone has followed the conversation this far. They ARE awake paid shills. There’s hundreds of thousands of them on Gov. payroll. They are the ones who’ve seen all the 9/11 evidence and still call critically thinking people conspiracy theorists.
I remember pristine cloudless clear blue AZ skies for months at a time.(named the cleanest air in the country by Money magazine 2004).
I remember that any commercial jet we occasionally saw was way up at cruising altitude, and you really only saw the short DISAPPEARING trail following along behind it.
I remember taking photos right into the sun without weird reflective spots showing up in the pictures.
I DON’T remember not being able see past the first set of mountain ranges from my window. I used to be able to see 5.
I DON’T remember hundreds of planes a week leaving spreading trails that within an hour create a cirrus type overcast. Or lines that have side sprays that look like a comb. Or popcorn shaped clouds (normal) that each have a wispy tail hanging from them (not normal). Or lines that have perfect swirl patterns in them that look like they were dispenced from a cake decorating tool.
I DON’T remember not being able to look right at the sun. Now there is so much reflection and intensity you can’t look even for a second.
I DON’T remember hot pink sunsets every single time there are ‘clouds’ in the sky. Brilliant orange and yellow, yes, but not intense hot pink. The ARE pretty, but deady.
Critical thinking, common sense, logic along with photographic evidence.. Don’t debate shills presenting strawman arguements.
.
Bob- its fun poking holes in myths…
You see “trails” and just assume…when the facts suggest otherwise…
As for Contrail Science- they were not “quoted” they merely were referenced as a repository for source material dating back 100 years…
Perhaps you could point out any information on that website you find incorrect.
Here are the Iowa Chemtrails from yesterday, September 12, 2011 in Chicago Illinois USA
~ ^/>
~ ~ ^/>
~ ~ ~ ^/>
dw31243
Chemtrails Chicago, IL September 12, 2011 – Sears Tower
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jl0LECUXduo
dw31243
Chemtrails Chicago Illinois September 12, 2011
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLDShIpX-7I
http://weather.rap.ucar.edu/satellite/displaySat.php?region=DSM&itype=ir&size=small&endDate=20110912&endTime=20&duration=12
weather.rap.ucar.edu/satellite/displaySat.php?region=DSM&itype=ir&size=small&endDate=20110912&endTime=20&duration=12
http://coastwatch.glerl.noaa.gov/modis/modis.cgi/modis?region=g&page=1
coastwatch.glerl.noaa.gov/modis/modis.cgi/modis?region=g&page=1
http://coastwatch.glerl.noaa.gov/modis/data/2011/jpg/a1.11255.1845.CIS_Great_Lakes.143.250m.jpg
http://coastwatch.glerl.noaa.gov/modis/data/2011/jpg/t1.11255.1704.CIS_Great_Lakes.143.250m.jpg
http://lance-modis.eosdis.nasa.gov/imagery/subsets/?subset=AERONET_BONDVILLE.2011255
lance-modis.eosdis.nasa.gov/imagery/subsets/?subset=AERONET_BONDVILLE.2011255
http://lance-modis.eosdis.nasa.gov/imagery/subsets/tmp/AERONET_BONDVILLE.2011255.terra.250m.jpg
http://lance-modis.eosdis.nasa.gov/imagery/subsets/tmp/AERONET_BONDVILLE.2011255.terra.367.250m.jpg
http://lance-modis.eosdis.nasa.gov/imagery/subsets/tmp/AERONET_BONDVILLE.2011255.aqua.250m.jpg
But ice and water are by far the most likely in high altitude clouds.
There’s actually three major ways you get those “prismatic” colors. diffraction (iridescent clouds), refraction (halos, sun dogs), and reflected refraction (rainbows). The video above seems to be showing the first two.
It’s also had the contrast greatly boosted, which makes it look a lot more dramatic than reality.
These are deliberately sprayed atomized clouds of aluminum & barium, I’ve been watching the skies for 45 years, there’s nothing natural about these.
Why shills & the willingly ignorant continue to deny them is absurd, after all, what goes up, must come down & this toxic crap affects everyone who breathes.
Sundogs, Boy you trolls really are getting creative….Everybody on this site sees through you dis-info crap….Move on……
yup…physics is “disinfo”- phenomena observed for 1000s of years and fully explained by basic science is “disinfo”…
Its clear the education systems are indeed failing…
some people need to read the regulation on geoengineering from the uk parliment. gov website, my next video will backup claims about easyjet watch this air space.
Wonderful work! That is the type of info that are supposed to be shared around the web. Disgrace on Google for no longer positioning this publish higher! Come on over and seek advice from my website . Thanks =)
I needed to send you the bit of word so as to say thank you the moment again for your striking views you have shared in this case. It’s certainly strangely generous with people like you to allow unhampered exactly what some people would’ve made available for an electronic book to generate some dough on their own, specifically considering that you could possibly have tried it in case you wanted. These guidelines additionally worked like a great way to comprehend other individuals have the same dream just as my own to see very much more in regard to this condition. I think there are lots of more pleasant sessions ahead for people who look into your blog post… Corine @