Research Docs Show the Aluminum Nanoparticles are Toxic and Geoengineering is NOT Cost Effective
Chemtrail Health Impacts, Featured Tuesday, August 30th, 2011
PDF 
Probability of Intermittent Geoengineering from a 2011 report titled "Reexamining the Economics of Aerosol Geoengineering"
There are numerous research reports that provide documented evidence of the toxicity of aluminum nanoparticles (known to be a component of chemtrails-geoengineering). For example, see the report titled “In Vitro Toxicity of Aluminum Nanoparticles in Rat Alveolar Macrophages” by the Air Force Research Laboratory, written in 2001: http://t.co/zlLPzsc
Further documentation on the toxicity of aluminum nanoparticles: “In Vitro Toxicity of Aluminum Nanoparticles in Human Keratinocytes” by the Air Force Institute of Technology, written in 2008:
Abstract: http://t.co/Oma9rXp
Full doc: http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?Location=U2&doc=GetTRDoc.pdf&AD=ADA482760
A more scholarly work on “Aluminum Nanoparticle Toxicity” affect on animals is “Cellular Interaction of Different Forms of Aluminum Nanoparticles in Rat Alveolar Macrophages“, April 2007 (see the conclusion on the last page): http://t.co/hUMLRnR
See also “Consistency and Reproducibility of Bioaerosol Delivery for Infectivity Studies on Mice“, by the Applied Research Associates, dated March 2010: http://t.co/ZGIXRgS
Finally, here’s a recent report titled “Reexamining the economics of aerosol geoengineering“, which concludes that aerosol geoengineering fails cost benefit analysis: http://t.co/hmpCpza
Posted by Community
on Aug 30 2011. Filed under Chemtrail Health Impacts, Featured.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.
You can leave a response or trackback to this entry
Loading ...
Nice, very nice.
Actually, the only relevant research you posted are the portions regarding aluminum oxide nanoparticles which have been proposed for use in geoengineering. Aluminum nanoparticles have not been proposed for use in geoengineering.
Thus, the paper, “In Vitro Toxicity of Aluminum Nanoparticles in Human Keratinocytes” has no relevance since it deals only with aluminum nanoparticles, not aluminum oxide nanoparticles.
I also note that there were no toxic effects from aluminum oxide at any of the levels being reported in rainwater. Most of the rain water samples contain aluminum levels 1000 times less than any used in these experiments.
This is the highest reported level by the Coalitionagainstgeoenginering website:
http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/library/testing/california/private/shasta11_08ELakeShastaLightningRain.pdf
Which shows 3,450 micrograms/ liter, equal to 3.45 micrograms/ml, lower than anything used in vitro in the papers above.
As the coalition didn’t bother to characterize the actual source of aluminum found in their water tests, no conclusion can actually be made for what was in any of the rain water samples. For example, the aluminum could have come from rock dust aluminum oxide which makes up 16% of Mt. Shasta, in which case aluminum oxide toxicity papers might be relevant. It could simply be, however, that the aluminum in the rain water was from alumino-silicate clay dust which makes up 60% of earth’s crust.
Finally, based on rain and snow sample results from the past 40 years, none of the coaltion’s samples on average are remarkable:
http://metabunk.org/threads/135-Chemical-Composition-of-rain-and-snow
It looks like those who contend that contrails are chemtrails need to go back to the drawing board and start over.
Aluminium nanoparticles are already used in geoengineering.
Sr.Jay Reynolds : endless analysis of rain water and show large amounts of aluminum, a high level: it is common sense: they are spraying intensively day and night, how there will be no contamination by aluminum?.
Your comment is on the line: “Do not worry, nothing happens”
Please look in his eyes the airplanes spraying night and day, producing horrible chemtrails and not take us for fools saying “found minimal levels of aluminum.”
Act ethically and read the website of independent researcher Clifford Cárnicom and the admirable and brave doctora Staninger :she is diagnosing more and more patients Morguellons.
From Spain ,Keira
Only ordinary levels of aluminum have been found in rainwater:
http://metabunk.org/threads/135-Chemical-Composition-of-rain-and-snow
I personally feel that all cost estimates for a SRM aerosol geoengineering program are vastly understated.
1.The biggest obstacle is getting the required material high into the stratosphere over twice the altitude of ordinary planes being photographed creating putative chemtrails. Somewhere around 20 miles high. This is why the geoengineers laugh at folks who take pictures of planes 6 miles high and consder you buffoons.
2. Secondly, doing so will require designing and building a new fleet built to eet that altitude, and operating the equivalent of another American Airlines.
3. Such an operation would have to be multi-national and experience shows that such operations have cost overruns doubling or tripling the originally estimated cost. Ever see a government operation come out within budget?
Lastly, in my personal opinon, there is no need for such a program and it will never be needed. I am a skeptic of the idea of runaway global warming.
However, whomever posted the last document in the original posting who wrote: ““Reexamining the economics of aerosol geoengineering“, which concludes that aerosol geoengineering fails cost benefit analysis”
was completely wrong. While there may indeed be a failure of cost-benefit analysis with the idea of aerosol geoengineering, the paper referenced makes NO SUCH CONCLUSION!
I have perused the paper, and here is what it says->
Quote:
“In this paper, we consider other, and we believe more reasonable, geoengineering usage scenarios. In so doing, we demonstrate that geoengineering CAN pass a cost-benefit test over almost the entire range of
scenarios considered by GTK.”
This Jay Reynolds person seems awfully passionate about pointing out something that “doesn’t exist”…. Imagine a website where people go to complain about the DMV and some random person (like Jay Reynolds) logs in and spends hours trying to defend the DMV, but says he doesn’t work for the DMV. Who would waste their time on a website like that? Wouldn’t that seem suspicious?
It”s called running counter intelligence.
I note that John Doe produced no information contradicting any of my posting.
Plenty of people post to various websites on subjects that they either agree or disagree about. Neither case requires prerequisites at aircrap.org,, to my knowledge.
Sr.Reynolds: you are denying the obvious: the greatest crime in history of humanity, as defined by the admirable and brave Clifford Carnicom: chemtrails, geoengineering.
You said something stupid and a lie horrible HUGE “THE LEVELS OF ALUMINUM IN WATER ARE NORMAL”
Infinite analysis indicate a very high level of aluminum: it is common sense: they are constantly spraying.
Sr.Reynolds: you are a debunker , a steel and a disseminator of lies, how much money you paid to do this “work”? ¿yoy do not have a shred of conscience?¿can you sleep at night?
Rectified, has a minimum of ethics, readers of this website we are also superb informados.No dawdle. Debunker.No Stop being messy is magnificent web …
John Doe: yes, Mr. Reynolds is suspected, it is obviously a debunker who tries to appear “educated”, but his attitude is pathetic
Keira
The levels of aluminum reported in rainfall by the Coalition Against Geoengineering President MichaelJ. Murphy remain within the range of those recorded in 1967, 1978, and more recent dates here:
http://metabunk.org/threads/135-Chemical-Composition-of-rain-and-snow
Unless you can show these historical results are false, the idea that the rain and snow samples currently being found indicate nothing out of the ordinary simply will not stand. That is why you have been unable to cite here any evidence to the contrary whatsoever.
What has happened is that the promoters of chemtrail theory have neglected to examine what is normal before crying out that their results are abnormal!
Unless you wish to go against the facts, you must do as scientists have always done, which is to revise your theory when your results are found incorrect and move on.
Insistence on assasination of the messenger who tells you history will never change that history, but it will make you look foolish.
Still a great post. Slowin’ the eugenicist geoengineers in Brit down.
Here is the exact paper referenced above that show that aerosol geoengineering is NOT cost effective: “The economics (or lack thereof) of aerosol geoengineering” by Marlos Goes, Nancy Tuana, and Klaus Keller http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/phod/docs/Goes_etal_2011.pdf
It’s a Conspiracy Theory! Way to Go People! You discounted, scoffed and laughed when true American’s stood up and questioned the “story.” But the psychopaths do not have to defend themselves or even give an explanation as to the crimes against America because to many people stand in the way. They scream Conspiracy Theory without even looking at the evidence. Turns out you was attacking people who were trying to defend you too. Now our Republic is gone forever. Good work… have fun.
It’s really a nice and useful piece of info. I’m happy that you just shared this helpful information with us. Please keep us informed like this. Thank you for sharing. My brother found a dentist catalog helped him find a dentist close to his home in San Diego.
Unquestionably consider that that you stated. Your favourite justification seemed to be on the web the easiest factor to take into accout of. I say to you, I definitely get annoyed even as people consider worries that they just do not understand about. You controlled to hit the nail upon the top and defined out the entire thing with no need side-effects , other folks could take a signal. Will probably be again to get more. Thank you
Etta James…..”Take Me To The River’….and wash the Aluminum Nanoparticiles off. Oh No ! Why do we even have to ask about this and when does it end and will Romney and or Obama end it now ? We’ll get the message out and are they teaching this in Science class in Public Education yet or do the third grader’s already know and asking their old school dumb teacher’s that didn’t have a glue.What is the difference in a Con Trail vs Chem Trail ? Are we selling the kits for American citizens to buy and check their soil and water ? Weather Warfare ? Does Obama support the research and will Romney ? Get this on CNN and bring about awareness with your research ! This is worse than horse slaughtering for human consumption that just recently passed.